Posts
9203
Following
97
Followers
79
Just a normal bunny-boy (not really) with a cute pink hat
I do stuff with taxes for a living and occasionally touch server-stuff for a hobby (when I am not banging my head against it and want to throw it out the window)

I love dressing girly occasionally, call me crossdresser. All future pics for that will be posted on my picdump-account on my sharkey-instance: https://shark.lightnovel-dungeon.de/@stefan (I will vet the followings there)

I also love sewing and reading (Light Novels especially)
@Johann150 Its your displayname. Go nuts! But yeah this bun is also looking forward to it.

Meeting cool people IN PERSON!
0
0
0
re: nerdsnipe? lösung-spoiler
Show content
@Johann150 Ich kann dir leider nicht 100% sagen wo das genau geregelt ist kann sein die bezieht sich hier auf das andere Gesetz me dunno. Ich mach keine Vollstreckung tbh.

Und für mich gibt es Zwangsgelder (Mehrzahl) einfach deswegen weil jede einzelne Handlung mit einem solchen belegt werden kann :D

Untersagung eines Gewerbes als nächsten möglichen Schritt meinte ich. Aber kannst dir wegdenken
0
0
2
@Johann150 @luap42 aber ich hab euch mal due Steuerliche Lösung dagelassen wenn interessiert
0
0
1
@Johann150 @luap42 Ich brauch halt keine Gerichte für ne Vollstreckung!
1
0
1
@luap42 @Johann150 joa ich hab da meine eigenen Befugnisse no need fot BVwVG neobun_llenn_cool_fingerguns
1
0
0
re: nerdsnipe?
Show content
@Johann150 okay mal meine Lösung wie sie bei der Abgabe von Steuererklärungen zu nehmen wäre.

a) Zwangsgelder sind zu erstatten da die geforderte Handlung vor Zahlung/Vollstreckung erbracht wurde
b) A hat Pech Zwangsgeld wird einbehalten. Handlung erst nach Zahlung
c) eigentlich wie b) aber weitere Zwangsmasnahmen möglich bzgl. E2 ggf auch untersagung mögl.
d) Festsetzung des Zwangsgeldes für E1 ist rechtswidrig und wieder aufzuheben da rechtsgrund entfallen ist. Zwangsgelf gegen E2 bleibt bestehen und wird nicht zurückgezahlt.

Ist mir auch egal ob das hier nicht stimmt
2
0
1
@luap42 @Johann150 Im Steuerrecht kann ich alles :P Vor allem weil es hier nicht um die Beitreibung einer Geldforderung geht
1
0
0
@Johann150 @luap42 kann mir also kaum vorstellen dass das sich bei Zwangsgeldern unterscheiden sollte da beides auf die Handlung, Duldung oder Unterlassung einer bestimmten Sache zielt.
1
0
1
@Johann150 @luap42 sollte sicherlich relativ ähnlich sein vom Anwendungsgebiet. Die vollstreckung solcher Zwangsgelder ist ja zivilrecht more or less
2
0
1
@Johann150 @luap42 oh okay da wüsste ich tatsächlich was sache ist. Sowas ist beim Finanzamt auch oft ein Ding
1
0
1
@Johann150 @luap42 Ich hab Steuerrecht studiert und kein Jura. Das war mehr so ein Seitenhieb gegen Leute die sich für Verwaltungsrecht interessieren neobun_llenn_sweat
2
0
1
@mametsuko its mames birthday (soon)?
1
0
0
@SuperDicq @forestcat @subnetter I dunno the specifics on that workshop but still it might be a valid thing to have workshops where no cis-men are present. Fears and anxiety exist you know.

Programming and PC stuff is a very male-dominated field. So having a few workshops that target flinta only is valuable since they are marginalized in the field in general.

Is not the nicest thing not include you in this specific example? Maybe. But there may be a justification.

Like having other people be able to take part in a workshop when they otherwise could not.

I don't see this as hostile to you espcially but maybe as a "having something for a subset of people as well"

And again I dunno if its worth to die on that hill. Just because some of the workshops may not be open to you.
0
0
2
@fristi i could use some lekker tosti
0
0
0
@SuperDicq @forestcat @subnetter

Mate like I am sorry what are you even going on about?

In your place I would really not choose to die on that hill really. Not even as a cis-male myself (and occasional crossdresser). Some empathy is really needed for this discussion.

Not a woman myself but listening to women it gets kinda obvious why spaces need to exist that do not include cis-men (no matter how nice me and you may be). The problem is not me or you individually (very likely).

Patriarchy is really bad women and men alike. Like Hell I do not fit into your male stereotype really but still am better off than a women.

I also wish for less spaces that need to exclude people for their own safety or well-being. But as things stand being a women in public is more dangerous on average. May I remind of all the victimblaming, the cat-calling and other shitty stuff patriarchy enables toxic men to do.

Have enough of that shit I can totally understand why stuff like womens-only gyms are a thing.

There are people in these spaces that feel like they have to be on guard constantly because men are around. Which does not need to equate of hating all men btw. They can present themselves very different and be themselves in those places.

These spaces need to exist since society is kinda shit. And rather than bash your head against that the energy should rather be used to fight the shitty thing in the first place: Patriarchy and all its consequences.

And being so assertive to say to demand access to that space is very much toxic behaviour in itself.

There is an open question of how trans-men are handled in these spaces. I cannot tell you how they handle that but since a T is in the Acronym I guess they be welcome?

Also likely no one will press you about being trans or not likely. Thats inappropriate behaviour but so is invading the spaces when you are cis-man. Just don't be dick bro.

Also people having their own spaces does not take anything away from you realistically as well. You are framing this as if its the only thing availiable. If it is stop moaning about it and inspire the change you want to see in the world. Offer some queer group or something as well if there is none.

But please don't harass women in such spaces.
1
0
2
@rick hast wohl net genug von Zügen bekommen
1
0
0
Show older